<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for AQ&#039;s Reviews</title>
	<atom:link href="http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com</link>
	<description>Entertaining Q</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:45:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wolfhound Century by Redhead</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/wolfhound-century/#comment-432</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redhead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 02:45:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?p=991#comment-432</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So happy you enjoyed it!  I did love Higgins&#039; prose style, but I&#039;m pretty sure you enjoy the book itself more than I did.
 

thanks for sending it back so quick, it showed up in my mailbox safe and sound the other day, with some lovely goodies tucked inside. :D]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So happy you enjoyed it!  I did love Higgins&#8217; prose style, but I&#8217;m pretty sure you enjoy the book itself more than I did.</p>
<p>thanks for sending it back so quick, it showed up in my mailbox safe and sound the other day, with some lovely goodies tucked inside. <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Wolfhound Century by Daniel Burton</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/2013/05/07/wolfhound-century/#comment-431</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel Burton]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 May 2013 23:06:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?p=991#comment-431</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m totally gonna read this. Either you&#039;re being paid by the Higgins, or it just sounds like a really interesting read. Thanks for reviewing and sharing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m totally gonna read this. Either you&#8217;re being paid by the Higgins, or it just sounds like a really interesting read. Thanks for reviewing and sharing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Flow My Tears, The Policeman Said by John Stephen Walsh</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/2012/10/10/flow-my-tears-the-policeman-said/#comment-428</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Stephen Walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?p=883#comment-428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Reading one of the biographies on PKD might give you some insight into the questions you ask in the review--try the chatty, casual I AM ALIVE AND YOU ARE DEAD as a light intro if interested. I don`t think it`s fair to think  a writer is a misogynist because of the unlikability of his characters, but I do think PKD`s problems with the women in his life emerge in his fiction [and got him in trouble with  the women in his life]. Likable characters aren`t a factor for me, and in PKD`s case are even less important, as the books become illustrations of his particular mental health issues--were he alive today he`d be on prescription meds and probably happier. But the gnarled, odd novels of the mid-60s to mid-70s are more interesting to me than 99% of the sf out there with its earnest, likable heroes doing the same damn things earnest, likable heroes are doing in 99% of sf novels. Thanks for reviewing this [I prefer UBIK, too].]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading one of the biographies on PKD might give you some insight into the questions you ask in the review&#8211;try the chatty, casual I AM ALIVE AND YOU ARE DEAD as a light intro if interested. I don`t think it`s fair to think  a writer is a misogynist because of the unlikability of his characters, but I do think PKD`s problems with the women in his life emerge in his fiction [and got him in trouble with  the women in his life]. Likable characters aren`t a factor for me, and in PKD`s case are even less important, as the books become illustrations of his particular mental health issues&#8211;were he alive today he`d be on prescription meds and probably happier. But the gnarled, odd novels of the mid-60s to mid-70s are more interesting to me than 99% of the sf out there with its earnest, likable heroes doing the same damn things earnest, likable heroes are doing in 99% of sf novels. Thanks for reviewing this [I prefer UBIK, too].</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rogue Moon by John Stephen Walsh</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/2012/10/11/rogue-moon/#comment-427</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John Stephen Walsh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 May 2013 00:24:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?p=887#comment-427</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I`m  glad to see people still reading this book, or any Budrys. His point of view seems influenced by his unconventional youth [he came with his family after they fled communism] and he just doesn`t approach stories the way many American writers do. I particularly find his endings problematic--they don`t build to a clash between a good guy and a bad guy and a resolution with one side defeated. ROGUE MOON has the feel of an extended Outer Limit episode without the bear. MICHELMAS is an extended dialogue between a kind of world-controlling T.V. reporter and his computer. SOME WILL NOT DIE is an odd post-apocalypse story following two storylines.  Definitely not for everybody, but I suspect his lack of linear storylines has a bit to do with some people not liking his work--he rewards multiple readings, but he`s never gonna work for folks who like space war novels [not implying this is why you didn`t like it, your reasons are perfectly logical]. Thanks for sharing your thoughts  on this book, it is a favorite.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I`m  glad to see people still reading this book, or any Budrys. His point of view seems influenced by his unconventional youth [he came with his family after they fled communism] and he just doesn`t approach stories the way many American writers do. I particularly find his endings problematic&#8211;they don`t build to a clash between a good guy and a bad guy and a resolution with one side defeated. ROGUE MOON has the feel of an extended Outer Limit episode without the bear. MICHELMAS is an extended dialogue between a kind of world-controlling T.V. reporter and his computer. SOME WILL NOT DIE is an odd post-apocalypse story following two storylines.  Definitely not for everybody, but I suspect his lack of linear storylines has a bit to do with some people not liking his work&#8211;he rewards multiple readings, but he`s never gonna work for folks who like space war novels [not implying this is why you didn`t like it, your reasons are perfectly logical]. Thanks for sharing your thoughts  on this book, it is a favorite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Consider Phlebas by Redhead</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/2013/04/17/consider-phlebas/#comment-422</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Redhead]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 21 Apr 2013 23:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?p=984#comment-422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I recently picked up a copy of this one. Your review pretty much matches what I&#039;ve heard elsewhere,that this isn&#039;t the best Culture book, and probably isn&#039;t the best place to start. 

If you go for another Culture book, I really hope you do, try Player of Games or Look to Windward. They have the sprawling &quot;what the hell is going on? why are we doing this??&quot; plots, but are probably a more compelling read. The bizarro and meandering plots seem to be a Culture thing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I recently picked up a copy of this one. Your review pretty much matches what I&#8217;ve heard elsewhere,that this isn&#8217;t the best Culture book, and probably isn&#8217;t the best place to start. </p>
<p>If you go for another Culture book, I really hope you do, try Player of Games or Look to Windward. They have the sprawling &#8220;what the hell is going on? why are we doing this??&#8221; plots, but are probably a more compelling read. The bizarro and meandering plots seem to be a Culture thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Books Reviewed by Updates: Joachim Boaz&#8217;s List of Worthwhile Classic Esoteric/Science Fiction Blogs and Resources &#124; Science Fiction and Other Suspect Ruminations</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/list/#comment-405</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Updates: Joachim Boaz&#8217;s List of Worthwhile Classic Esoteric/Science Fiction Blogs and Resources &#124; Science Fiction and Other Suspect Ruminations]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:21:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?page_id=386#comment-405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] 5] AQ&#8217;s Reviews: Nice long, thought-out, and intriguing reviews of a mix of new and old science fiction.  For example, Vance&#8217;s Big Planet (1957), Hal Clement&#8217;s Needle (1950), etc&#8230;.   And there&#8217;s an INDEX. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] 5] AQ&#8217;s Reviews: Nice long, thought-out, and intriguing reviews of a mix of new and old science fiction.  For example, Vance&#8217;s Big Planet (1957), Hal Clement&#8217;s Needle (1950), etc&#8230;.   And there&#8217;s an INDEX. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Needle by Updates: Joachim Boaz&#8217;s List of Worthwhile Classic Esoteric/Science Fiction Blogs and Resources &#124; Science Fiction and Other Suspect Ruminations</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/2011/07/28/needle/#comment-404</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Updates: Joachim Boaz&#8217;s List of Worthwhile Classic Esoteric/Science Fiction Blogs and Resources &#124; Science Fiction and Other Suspect Ruminations]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:21:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?p=253#comment-404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] of new and old science fiction.  For example, Vance&#8217;s Big Planet (1957), Hal Clement&#8217;s Needle (1950), etc&#8230;.   And there&#8217;s an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of new and old science fiction.  For example, Vance&#8217;s Big Planet (1957), Hal Clement&#8217;s Needle (1950), etc&#8230;.   And there&#8217;s an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Big Planet by Updates: Joachim Boaz&#8217;s List of Worthwhile Classic Esoteric/Science Fiction Blogs and Resources &#124; Science Fiction and Other Suspect Ruminations</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/2013/01/14/big-planet/#comment-403</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Updates: Joachim Boaz&#8217;s List of Worthwhile Classic Esoteric/Science Fiction Blogs and Resources &#124; Science Fiction and Other Suspect Ruminations]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Mar 2013 21:21:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?p=941#comment-403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] and intriguing reviews of a mix of new and old science fiction.  For example, Vance&#8217;s Big Planet (1957), Hal Clement&#8217;s Needle (1950), etc&#8230;.   And there&#8217;s an [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and intriguing reviews of a mix of new and old science fiction.  For example, Vance&#8217;s Big Planet (1957), Hal Clement&#8217;s Needle (1950), etc&#8230;.   And there&#8217;s an [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rynn&#8217;s World by Word Wabbit</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/2013/02/15/rynns-world/#comment-402</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Word Wabbit]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:36:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?p=969#comment-402</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool, thanks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool, thanks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Rynn&#8217;s World by nawfalaq</title>
		<link>http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/2013/02/15/rynns-world/#comment-401</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nawfalaq]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2013 04:30:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://aqsreviews.wordpress.com/?p=969#comment-401</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Truly, I&#039;d start with &quot;Horus Rising&quot; by Dan Abnett.  But, this one ain&#039;t a bad thing to start with....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Truly, I&#8217;d start with &#8220;Horus Rising&#8221; by Dan Abnett.  But, this one ain&#8217;t a bad thing to start with&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
